The English language has borrowed a number of phrases from Russian. Some mirror numerous points of Russian or Soviet historical past and expertise. For instance, phrases reminiscent of “pogrom”, which means a violent riot aimed toward massacring Jews, or “sputnik” that refers to an area satellite tv for pc — the Soviets have been the primary to launch one again in 1957.
And a few phrases have been borrowed in all probability simply due to the “aww impact” they produce. “Babushka” — which means an aged lady, or a grandmother, with a scarf tied under the chin — is a kind of.
However maybe no phrase borrowed from Russian explains the character of at present’s Russian state higher than the expression “Potemkin village”. It originates from an apocryphal story about Russian prince Grigory Potemkin who allegedly instructed staff to construct pretend moveable villages to impress Catherine the Nice on their journey to Crimea in 1787.
To construct a Potemkin village is thus to create a pretend façade giving the looks of prosperity.
President Vladimir Putin’s Russia just isn’t merely an authoritarian regime. It’s a Potemkin state, wherein façades imitating fronts of precise state establishments haven’t any corresponding institutional substance behind them.
Its govt is a personalised system of energy primarily based on casual networks with Putin on the high. Its “parliament” is a rubber-stamp meeting that represents solely these “events” that have been fastidiously chosen by the presidential administration to reach what the Kremlin calls “parliamentary elections”. Its “judicial our bodies” are companies for punishing political dissent, on telephone calls from the Kremlin headquarters. Its state-sponsored “media” are a propaganda machine that has created an alternate actuality for the customers of its “info”.
It’s precisely by means of this attitude that we should always consider the cheesy theatrical efficiency that Moscow offered as “presidential elections” on 15-17 March. It’s inadequate, as some Western leaders now do, to name these “elections” unfree or unfair, as a result of to be able to be these they needed to be elections within the first place. They weren’t. No person will say {that a} plastic toy apple tastes unsavoury — it needs to be an precise apple to qualify for this evaluation. The identical with the Russian “elections”.
This attitude is culturally and psychologically not really easy to grasp, nonetheless.
In its practices of deception, the Kremlin goals to make us consider that Russia is — nonetheless defective and imperfect — nonetheless an precise state.
When the Russian authorities say they’re holding “elections”, the very mixture of sounds and letters used to convey their message triggers a cognitive course of that forces us to visualise democratic elections as we all know them.
This visualisation could also be modified by the media reporting on “unfair” or “unfree” traits of the “elections”, however it’s nearly not possible to think about something cognitively reverse to the phenomenon of elections as soon as the Kremlin triggered a related course of in our minds.
This trick lies on the basis of “mimetic energy” of Putin’s regime: a capability to affect different — principally democratic — nations’ views on Russia by imitating rules of their of functioning: common elections, division of powers, aggressive party-political system, unbiased judiciary, free media, and many others.
As soon as Kremlin stakeholders pronounce these phrases of their messages addressed to us, our deeply rooted psychological knee-jerk reactions make us think about corresponding phenomena as being falsely linked to Russia.
This can be a good instrument of malign affect, and in addition the one which affected the political methods of the Russian émigré opposition leaders.
Midday trick misfired
A number of weeks earlier than the “presidential elections”, some Russian expat circles introduced a collective motion, referred to as “Midday in opposition to Putin”, that urged anti-Putin Russian residents to point out up at “polling stations” at 12pm on Sunday, 17 March, and do no matter they wished to do there besides voting for Putin.
The now late Russian opposition chief Alexei Navalny, who was slowly executed in a Russian penal colony, supported the motion.
Concurrently, the identical Russian migrant influencers referred to as upon Western leaders to not recognise the outcomes of the Russian “presidential elections”.
What they didn’t realise, possible beneath the malign affect of the Kremlin’s cognitive offensive, is that legitimacy of any course of is set solely by the people who find themselves eligible to contemplate it as respectable or illegitimate. Within the case of the “elections”, these have been Russian residents who wanted to refuse to take part within the workings of Putin’s Potemkin state to be able to deny its legitimacy. And but the Russian influencers referred to as on these Russian residents to take an lively half within the occasion.
Join EUobserver’s every day publication
All of the tales we publish, despatched at 7.30 AM.
By signing up, you comply with our Phrases of Use and Privateness Coverage.
In consequence, the turnout on the “elections” was visibly excessive — many Russians did flip up at midday on Sunday for the motion and even kind queues to enter “polling stations” — thus contributing to the legitimacy of the “elections”.
Within the Potemkin state, it doesn’t matter the way you vote or what you do together with your poll. When you register to obtain it, you affirm the validity of the electoral course of. It got here as no shock that Putin himself thanked the organisers and promoters of the motion “Midday in opposition to Putin” — they helped him make the imitation of the elections look credible.
There isn’t any doubt that the “Midday in opposition to Putin” was a profitable psychotherapeutic session for the disaffected and determined Russians — by seeing different folks turning up at “polling stations” at midday, they may really feel that they weren’t alone and sense political solidarity.
Nonetheless, it’s the sinister nature of Putin’s Potemkin state that turned these emotions into an entry ticket to the Kremlin’s imitation circus and made them additional strengthen, quite than undermine, Putin’s authoritarian grip on energy.